<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for yamia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yamia.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yamia.net</link>
	<description>means youth</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Economy and the Church by Chris</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/02/economy-and-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.likeafire.net/2009/02/13/economy-and-the-church/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Agree...though there is still a place for programs and curriculum but I doubt the author would say there is no place for those.  A recalibration is certainly needed these days but authentic, genuine discipleship is costly and forces us to be the change ourselves which...is difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree&#8230;though there is still a place for programs and curriculum but I doubt the author would say there is no place for those.  A recalibration is certainly needed these days but authentic, genuine discipleship is costly and forces us to be the change ourselves which&#8230;is difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review - Never Silent by Chris</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/03/review-never-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yamia.likeafire.net/?p=652#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I am planting a church in the Northwest and I just handed a copy to each of our core team members.  Great book, and yes, deeply convicting and inspiring as John pointed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am planting a church in the Northwest and I just handed a copy to each of our core team members.  Great book, and yes, deeply convicting and inspiring as John pointed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review - Never Silent by John</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/03/review-never-silent/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yamia.likeafire.net/?p=652#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Never silent is an outstanding book, deeply convicting and inspiring!

John Hallock + (CANA)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never silent is an outstanding book, deeply convicting and inspiring!</p>
<p>John Hallock + (CANA)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I Don&#8217;t Twitter by Allison B</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/03/why-i-dont-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likeafire.net/?p=591#comment-32</guid>
		<description>SO FUNNY! I do not Twitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SO FUNNY! I do not Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I Don&#8217;t Twitter by Kim</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/03/why-i-dont-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.likeafire.net/?p=591#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I thought this was awesome!  But...I still twitter. LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this was awesome!  But&#8230;I still twitter. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Just something to thing about by Mary Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/02/just-something-to-thing-about/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.likeafire.net/2009/02/11/just-something-to-thing-about/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>wow. that is just weird!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow. that is just weird!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economy and the Church by Kim</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/02/economy-and-the-church/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.likeafire.net/2009/02/13/economy-and-the-church/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Word!  Great thoughts that every church should take to heart, whether they have the cash or not.  Just my own opinion, of course...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Word!  Great thoughts that every church should take to heart, whether they have the cash or not.  Just my own opinion, of course&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Theology vs. Listening - Church by Paul</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/02/theology-vs-listening-church/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.likeafire.net/2009/02/12/theology-vs-listening-church/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I hear you Beth, and agree that we are facing the same issue from different sides. I don't think anyone hears God perfectly, which is what it would take to make theology irrelevant. The next post is more where we are talking about.

My paradigm is based on the arrogance of people who have given up on hearing God and would never say they have a word from the Lord, but instead think they have theology figured out. Where your culture would divide over their personal hearing, mine would divide over their interpretation of scripture.

That is why I think church would still be needed, because we test each other and build each other up, sometimes confrontationally. I think your are right that it can't be unbalanced in either direction. We should meet in the middle on the next post.

Thanks for commenting. (and for your humility)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you Beth, and agree that we are facing the same issue from different sides. I don&#8217;t think anyone hears God perfectly, which is what it would take to make theology irrelevant. The next post is more where we are talking about.</p>
<p>My paradigm is based on the arrogance of people who have given up on hearing God and would never say they have a word from the Lord, but instead think they have theology figured out. Where your culture would divide over their personal hearing, mine would divide over their interpretation of scripture.</p>
<p>That is why I think church would still be needed, because we test each other and build each other up, sometimes confrontationally. I think your are right that it can&#8217;t be unbalanced in either direction. We should meet in the middle on the next post.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting. (and for your humility)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Theology vs. Listening - Church by Beth</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/02/theology-vs-listening-church/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.likeafire.net/2009/02/12/theology-vs-listening-church/#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Paul, we are so coming from two different directions on this!

I grew up in a church that dissed theology and emphasized "my own personal Jesus." But that itself is a theology, and the funny thing is that it is a theology that is just as destructive to being church as is Theology. Everyone gets so involved "having a personal (read "private") relationship with Jesus" and hearing Him tell them what to say to others that they don't remember that they are the BODY of Christ.

I was in high school for my first church split, and I am sorry to say that it was not the last. Just as often as the splits have been sparked by arguments over doctrine, they have been sparked by people who claim to or are perceived to be hearing God and being led by Him.

How to correct this? At some point we must  return to scripture and LEARN what Christ intends the Church to be. But to do that is to do theology!

I hear what you are after...but I fear that to define theology as "people who who don't hear God" is a mistake. That is just a definition of BAD theology.

Furthermore, to think that theology can be done apart from the Body of Christ-- spread across space and time--is also a mistake, one to which we protestants are particularly susceptible, as we tend to ignore entire swaths of the life of the Church, for the sake of "sola scriptura." The answer isn't to ditch theology, but to do theology BETTER.

We are all broken, sinful, missing the mark, and so we all overshoot the sweet spot where Christ stands, and believe  that the truth will be found  through prayer, OR r theology, OR praise and worship, OR social action. Lord forgive us, and lead us back to your center, to where You are, to where all these things are held together in perfect balance, to Your glory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, we are so coming from two different directions on this!</p>
<p>I grew up in a church that dissed theology and emphasized &#8220;my own personal Jesus.&#8221; But that itself is a theology, and the funny thing is that it is a theology that is just as destructive to being church as is Theology. Everyone gets so involved &#8220;having a personal (read &#8220;private&#8221;) relationship with Jesus&#8221; and hearing Him tell them what to say to others that they don&#8217;t remember that they are the BODY of Christ.</p>
<p>I was in high school for my first church split, and I am sorry to say that it was not the last. Just as often as the splits have been sparked by arguments over doctrine, they have been sparked by people who claim to or are perceived to be hearing God and being led by Him.</p>
<p>How to correct this? At some point we must  return to scripture and LEARN what Christ intends the Church to be. But to do that is to do theology!</p>
<p>I hear what you are after&#8230;but I fear that to define theology as &#8220;people who who don&#8217;t hear God&#8221; is a mistake. That is just a definition of BAD theology.</p>
<p>Furthermore, to think that theology can be done apart from the Body of Christ&#8211; spread across space and time&#8211;is also a mistake, one to which we protestants are particularly susceptible, as we tend to ignore entire swaths of the life of the Church, for the sake of &#8220;sola scriptura.&#8221; The answer isn&#8217;t to ditch theology, but to do theology BETTER.</p>
<p>We are all broken, sinful, missing the mark, and so we all overshoot the sweet spot where Christ stands, and believe  that the truth will be found  through prayer, OR r theology, OR praise and worship, OR social action. Lord forgive us, and lead us back to your center, to where You are, to where all these things are held together in perfect balance, to Your glory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Listen Retreat by Paul</title>
		<link>http://yamia.net/2009/02/the-listen-retreat/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.likeafire.net/2009/02/11/the-listen-retreat/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Beth, thanks for commenting. I agree that there is definitely more room for both/and. In fact, I have already blogged it (it just hasn't been posted yet). What I was trying to do on this retreat was to focus on one to balance out the other. I have often just appealed to understanding so I wanted to try something different. I have a leader who could do a whole retreat on "doing", but that would have to e his retreat, since I can't lead them where I haven't been.

Interesting about the diagram. I think I would naturally lean more toward the mystic, though that word has too much baggage for me. I usually balk at the meyers/briggs stuff, but I like this one because it addresses how extremes can be unhealthy.

I'll see if I can find the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth, thanks for commenting. I agree that there is definitely more room for both/and. In fact, I have already blogged it (it just hasn&#8217;t been posted yet). What I was trying to do on this retreat was to focus on one to balance out the other. I have often just appealed to understanding so I wanted to try something different. I have a leader who could do a whole retreat on &#8220;doing&#8221;, but that would have to e his retreat, since I can&#8217;t lead them where I haven&#8217;t been.</p>
<p>Interesting about the diagram. I think I would naturally lean more toward the mystic, though that word has too much baggage for me. I usually balk at the meyers/briggs stuff, but I like this one because it addresses how extremes can be unhealthy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll see if I can find the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.192 seconds -->
